Journalists turned protesters to condemn police violence
and defend press freedom this past Sunday
during the event ;b
Earlier this evening, thousands of silver-haired individuals took part in a protest march in support of younger extradition law protesters. Although nominally a silent march, it seemed like many of the participants couldn't resist the opportunity to give voice to their demands (such as in this Tweeted video clip, where they can be heard chanting "Carrie Lam, step down" in Cantonese).
The assembly point for today's march was Chater Garden, the site of protest rallies organized in recent weeks by mothers who also wanted to show that the extradition bill is not just the concern of young Hong Kongers. With a far shorter route than, say, those for the mega protest marches of June 9th and 16th, many people who would have had major difficulty completing those others were able to take part, including a silver-haired attendee with one leg who propelled himself along on crutches.
I
have to admit: that photo of that determined individual caused me to
well up. It also got me thinking back to an assertion made by someone
who refuses to believe that the majority of Hong Kongers are against the
proposed -- and supposedly now "dead" but not yet withdrawn -- extraditioon bill that even if it really was the case that two million people went out into the streets on June 16th to show their opposition to it,
the fact that "only" two million people did so meant that there still
are over five million Hong Kongers who have no problems with it.
More
specifically, I think that assertion doesn't stand to reason because I
am sure there are lots of opponents to the bill whose physical health
makes it so that they are unable to go out on the streets to protest
against it; and this particularly so since some of the marches are now
getting so many people out on the streets at the same time as to
literally bring traffic -- foot and vehicular -- to a standstill! And
then there also are people unable for other reasons to take part in the
protests, including because they have to work on those days and at those
times that those protests are taking place.
Among
them are those members of the Fourth Estate whose job it is to cover
the protests. And while it might be said that the press is supposed to
be impartial, the fact of the matter is that, especially after being subjected to police brutality or witnessing this happening to their colleagues -- or "just" fellow humans
-- in recent weeks, it is only to be expected that they will end up
taking sides. Thus it was that, this past Sunday, Hong Kong journalists
and their supporters staged a protest of their own -- against police
violence and for press freedom -- and that at this event, signs calling
for Carrie Lam to step down along with such as the Hong Kong colonial
flag were in evidence as well as blown up photographic evidence of inappropriate policing that has taken place at recent extradition bill protests.
Taken
by themselves, today's silver haired protest march and the press' on
Sunday might not amount to much, especially in terms of numbers of
participants. But I think the fact that they have taken place and are
among a whole series of protests occuring in various parts of Hong Kong
that have included ones organized by mothers and will include one by
social workers later this week as well as more "regular" protest
organizers like the Civil Human Rights Front
says a great deal about the level -- and varied circles -- of
opposition that there is to the extradition bill and Carrie Lam's
administration in Hong Kong society these days.
No comments:
Post a Comment