Mood this week in Hong Kong
It's not yet over but here's stating all the same that it's been one hell of a crap week in Hong Kong. Never mind the bad weather (which has included typhoon warnings getting issued -- thanks, Typhoon Maliksi!). Though I must say that the gray days and weeping skies have felt reflective of many people's moods.
The day after the first arrests under Article 23 were made, a seventh individual was apprehended -- also over "seditious posts" by and on a Facebook page known as the ChowHangTung club that appear to be nothing more than "daily posts in memory of the
events in Tiananmen Square and the vigils held in Hong Kong until 2019
to remember them"! ("The initiative", a P.I.M.E. Asia news piece explains, "is linked to Chow’s legal battle. She was arrested for
her role in organising commemorations in Victoria Park. For this reason,
she has been in prison since September 2021, and is still awaiting
trial after almost three years.")
As Freedom House research director Yaqiu Wang observed in a piece in The Diplomat: "The fact that the authorities keep throwing new charges at Chow for the
one thing she did – organize commemorations to honor those killed by
their government for peacefully demanding freedom and democracy – only
speaks to the insecurity that she inspires in her own government and in
Beijing."
Something also worth point out -- which Wang does in her piece: "Beijing’s determination to crush Hong Kong’s freedoms and to erase
history is illustrated by the multiple, years-long prosecutions against
Chow. However, Chow’s courage and resolve in the face of this repression
exemplify Hong Kongers’ collective determination to fight back."
In a development that now passes for a "Thank goodness for small mercies" one, all of those arrestees -- bar for Chow Hang-tung, who was already behind bars at the time of her arrest on this (new) charge -- have been granted bail. One way in which many of us found this out was by seeing a photo of one of the six, Lee Ying-chi (a dentist by profession), waiting in line to get into court to see and hear on Thursday morning the verdict being given of the Hong Kong 47.
The day before the verdict of the largest political trial in Hong Kong's history was due to be handed out, an observer Tweeted that "If this goes the way GovHK wants it to go, they're never going to shake the optics of arresting/convicting political opponents for the crime of having a strategy to legally win an election they were never supposed to win that also stood a real chance of succeeding"; and "They can scream all they want about subversion and foreign forces etc, and maybe they even believe it, but to everyone else in actual democracies it's going to look like exactly what it is -- an authoritarian govt jailing political enemies who had too much public support".
Sadly, that's what came to pass. For more than three years and three months after 47 organizers and participants of a pro-democracy primary staged in 2020 were arrested on February 28th, 2021, the three hand-picked national security law judges decided that only two of the individuals concerned were innocent of the conspiracy to commit subversion charges laid on them.
"In a summary of the verdict distributed to media, the court said the [other]
election participants had declared they would use their legislative
power to veto the budgets" -- ooooh, so bad! Put another way: In the words of journalist Ryan Ho Kilpatrick, "they tried to win an election." And, added a member of the diasporic Hong Kong Twitterverse, "In the most peaceful, democratic way."
Still, lest barrister (and ex-cop as well as district councillor) Lawrence Lau and former district councillor (and registered social worker) Lee Yue-shun, who made history by being the first two people tried under the Beijing-imposed national security law to be cleared of their charges think it's all over, "Director of Public Prosecutions Maggie Yang on Thursday afternoon said
that she had received instruction from Secretary for Justice Paul Lam
that the justice department would seek to appeal the acquittal of Lau
and Lee." Of course!
And with mitigation hearings and appeals by at least some of those found guilty also still to come, this case is set to run through the summer; with sentencing not taking place for some months yet. During which, the stress and misery for many, if not all, of the people involved will continue. (Reading the piece of AP's Kanis Leung on the toll of Beijing's national security law on Hong Kong's activists before the verdict was already heartbreaking.)
Adding to the tragedy and/or farce of it all, five members of the League of Social Democrats (including Chan Po-ying, the group's head and spouse of "Long Hair" Leung Kwok-hung, one of the Hong Kong 47) were arrested after attempting to stage a protest outside the courthouse on Thursday afternoon. In another "Thank goodness for small mercies": they were released a day later (i.e., yesterday).
More than by the way, Chan Po-ying is the subject of a piece by AFP's Xinqi Su which appears on the Hong Kong Free Press' website today with headlines that emphasize that she's spent decades fighting for democracy with Long Hair -- and has continued to do so after his national security law arrest. The following is how the piece concludes -- and I think is a good way to conclude this blog post:
Chan said it was important that people keep speaking up.“What we have been trying to emphasise is that we don’t want society to be voiceless,” she said.
“When there is no other narratives than the one and only official version, I think as a humble citizen and resident, it’s our duty to history that we shall not let others alter our history and memories,” she added.
(My emphasis.)
No comments:
Post a Comment